When an inventor creates something for a specific purpose, and no matter how many times he tries, his creation simply fails to fulfil the purpose for which it was created, does the inventor not eventually abandon that creation?

     When man turns to God his creator and says, “I will make of this creation that You created a purpose other than that which it was created for”, is that man not telling God that HE shall choose for himself what the purpose of His creation is? And where have we heard this all before? For in the natural, when does that which has been created for a specific purpose ever turn around and tell its creator that it has decided that it’s purpose is different from the reason for which it was created?

     And yet man seems to think that he can do that with his own creator? That he can turn to God and say “I was created for a different purpose”, even when he wasn’t? Is that not the height of rebellion and defiance? And is it not rebellion and defiance that ultimately challenge God? Not the specific details of the act? For is it not the rebellion and defiance by our own children that ultimately stirs our own anger as parents (creators)? And yet we feel it’s perfectly okay to condone and advocate our own rebellion and defiance with the primordial and patriarchal Father? Is that not hypocritical? Would we allow our own children to stand up in our house and rebel and defy us? And yet we would insist that God condone this in HIS house? Is that not double standards? And does the inviolable wisdom of the word of God not say that a double-minded man is unstable in all his ways? Is it not written that a house divided cannot stand?

     For does God not despise rape or murder? And is not rape a purpose for which man was not created for? So whilst it is okay for man to stand against the practices of those who would advocate pursuing purposes for which man was not created for, such as the rape of children, and the misuse of the gift of life through the heinous abuse of child and human trafficking, it’s somehow not okay to declare that man was not created for homosexuality? And that if you do speak against the misuse of the purpose for which man was created, that those who do are guilty of a “hate crime” and “hate speech”? Is that not a misdirection and a redirection? Is it not a very clever and ingenious ploy to take focus “off themselves” and “misplace it elsewhere”? God does not approve of homosexuality simply because it is not the purpose for which man was created.

     For is it rather not those who insist on their fellow man accepting contrary purposes to those for which man was created not the ones who show the ultimate disdain and disregard for others and themselves? Not the other way around? Is it not through them that we all suffer the greatest violence? For is not rape and murder violent? For in rape and murder, do they not take what they violently help themselves unto “by force”? Is it not for this reason that it is written that “the kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent take it by force”? (Matthew 11:12).

     And is the purpose for which we have been created not now suffering a greater and more insidious kind of violence than ever before that is now taking the whole world by force? Are we not seeing the four corners of the earth being stirred through clever misdirection and redirection to stand up against what has been cleverly labelled as “hate speech”? For are we not seeing the looming and imminent arrival of a world-wide hatred for Christianity as a violent opposition to “hate speech” storming the hilltop of every nation? Oh what an ingenious twist and distortion. How subtle and sinister. How deceptive and cunning. For is it not written, “Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made“? (Genesis 3:1). For who do you think is behind this? And what do you think is the ultimate goal? For it’s not about homosexuality at all. That’s a red herring. It’s about establishing national laws on a global scale that prohibit hate speech, so that through those laws, it can dismantle and drive underground the one thing that upholds and defends all civil liberties of society and life — God!

     The times are now upon us when nation after nation will begin to introduce national laws opposed to “hate speech” as a clever way of silencing and dismantling Christianity, both “by violence” and “by force”. Which, ironically, is the legalisation of its own kind of hate speech - an institutionalised hate against God and Christianity. So that those who truly hate God may do violence to all those who love God, and to all the good reasons for why we were created, by being legally empowered to see to it that whilst those laws remain in effect, that the kingdom of heaven not only suffers violence, but that the violent may take it by force.